2017 Review of Asian Hatching Egg Production Regulation
The purpose of this supervisory review is to determine the extent to which Asian hatching egg production should be regulated, beyond biosecurity, food safety and premises identification programs, to help fulfill sound marketing policy.
There is an extensive history behind the establishment of a strategic level of regulation for BC broiler hatching egg specialty production (Silkie, Taiwanese, and other Asian breeds). Learn more about this history by reading this March 29, 2016 BCFIRB appeal decision: Skye Hi Farms Inc & Casey Van Ginkel - Decision (PDF).
In this decision, BCFIRB directed the BC Broiler Hatching Egg Commission (BHEC) to:
- Cancel (rescind) its specialty regulations
- Ensure specialty producers are in compliance with basic biosecurity requirements (including disease management and food safety)
- Conduct a transparent, inclusive, and informed process to determine the level of regulation, beyond basic biosecurity requirements, needed to achieve sound marketing policy objectives
BHEC complied with BCFIRB's directions listed above.
After the March 29, 2016 decision, Asian hatching egg producers filed an appeal of BHEC's above process as well as pending decision. On August 16, 2016, BCFIRB dismissed this appeal as premature: W. Friesen, Skye Hi Farms Inc.,Casey Van Ginkel dba V3 Farms, Coastline & Bradner Farms (PDF).
On August 19, 2016, BHEC requested BCFIRB approves its proposal to exclude Asian hatching egg production from regulation, with the exception of biosecurity, food safety, and premise identification requirements: Request for Prior Approval for the Exclusion Permit Program of the Asian Breeder Producers (PDF).
BCFIRB reviewed BHEC’s prior-approval request. On September 16, 2016, BCFIRB determined it would consider the request through a principles-based approach using the SAFETI principles – Strategic, Accountable, Fair, Effective, Transparent, and Inclusive: BHEC Appeals Referred to Supervisory Review Decision (PDF).
On October 19, 2016, a BCFIRB supervisory panel met with BHEC. All parties agreed that BHEC would address outstanding process and information gaps through a BCFIRB-approved process before the supervisory panel would make a decision on BHEC’s final request.
- Update on the BC Broiler Hatching Egg Commission Process Development Regarding the Supervisory Review of Asian Breeder Producers (PDF) – November 29, 2016
- Specialty Regulation Supervisory Review Work Plan Approval (PDF) – December 16, 2016
Following BCFIRB’s approval of BHEC’s Work Plan, BCFIRB suspended BHEC’s process given the resignation of BHEC’s Chair. On January 26, 2017, a new BHEC Chair was appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council and BHEC re-started its review process, outlined in the Review Process section below.
- Specialty Regulation supervisory Review – Process Suspension (PDF) – January 13, 2017
- Revised Specialty Regulation Supervisory Review – Work Plan (PDF) – March 9, 2017
The review process is divided into three phases.
Phase 1: Consultation and Research
- Stakeholder consultation questions posted and distributed on March 9, 2017
- Stakeholder submissions deadline was March 23, 2017
- Background information report and stakeholder input posted and sent to BCFIRB for review on April 18, 2017: Background Information and Documentation Update (PDF)
Note: In the report, BHEC provided further opportunity for stakeholder engagement through the addition of a stakeholder meeting to discuss options and an extension of the stakeholder responses deadline (see Phase 2 below).
Phase 2: Options Development
- On May 19, 2017, BHEC published a draft report with options to stakeholders and BCFIRB: Draft Pros and Cons Discussion Document – Review of Asian Breeder Regulation (PDF)
- Face-to-face meetings were held to discuss options with stakeholders on May 30-31, 2017
- Stakeholder responses were due to BHEC on June 5, 2017
- BHEC reviewed all information to date and confirmed options-related issues/questions it considers outstanding on June 8, 2017, and communicated the outstanding issues/questions to stakeholders on June 9, 2017: Commission Outstanding Industry Questions (PDF)
- Stakeholder responses are due June 16, 2017
Note: On June 2, 2017, BHEC sent a request to amend its process to account for new information. BCFIRB approved the amendments. The rationale and amendments are outlined in following documents and reflected in the bullets under Phases 2 and 3:
- Request to BCFIRB Regarding the Asian Breeder Work Action Plan (PDF) – June 2, 2017
- BCFIRB Approval of Asian Breeder Work Action Plan Schedule Revision (PDF) – June 2, 2017
Phase 3: Prior-Approval Assessment
On June 28, 2017, BHEC submitted its recommendations to BCFIRB:
- Final Recommendations to BCFIRB (PDF) – June 28, 2017
- Final Recommendations Appendix Part 1 (PDF) – June 28, 2017
- Final Recommendations Appendix Part 2 (PDF) – June 28, 2017
BCFIRB received letters from stakeholders seeking an opportunity to be heard directly by BCFIRB:
- Hunter Party Request for Direct Input (PDF) – June 30, 2017
- Harvey Party Request for Direct Input (PDF) – July 4, 2017
BCFIRB reviewed BHEC's recommendations and rationale and determined that it required further information. Following are BCFIRB letters as well as BHEC and stakeholder submissions:
- BCFIRB Specialty Supervisory Review Next Steps (PDF) – July 19, 2017
- BCFIRB Specialty Supervisory Review Questions (PDF) – August 25, 2017
- BCFIRB Approval of Extension Request (PDF) – September 15, 2017
- BHEC Response to Supervisory Review Questions (PDF) – September 29, 2017
- BHEC Clarification (PDF) – October 3, 2017
- Skye Hi Farms Inc., V3 Farms and W Friesen Enterprise Response (PDF) – October 13, 2017
- W Friesen Affidavit (PDF) – October 13, 2017
- Coastline Bradner Response (PDF) – October 13, 2017
BHEC is to submit its final reply to BCFIRB by 4:30pm on October 20, 2017. BCFIRB will determine what, if any, further steps are necessary before issuing a final supervisory decision.
As required by the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act, BCFIRB must find that BHEC’s recommendations are in accord with “sound marketing policy” and comply with governing legislation, regulation and agreements.