BC conservation status ranks reflect the risk of extirpation of species and ecological communities that occur in B.C. and can inform conservation action and natural resource decision making.
The BC Conservation Data Centre (BC CDC) conducts conservation status assessments to determine conservation status ranks. Lower numeric ranks indicate higher risk of extirpation relative to higher ranks. For example, a species ranked S1 is more at risk of extirpation than a species ranked S2.
Conducting conservation status assessments
We assess the conservation status of species and ecological communities by evaluating their rarity, trends in rarity and condition, and the specific threats they face. We follow conservation status assessment methodology and standards established by NatureServe – a network of professionals who use science inform conservation.
Assessments occur on a rotating basis. Given the large number of species and ecological communities, we assess a limited number of groups each year. As a result, there may be a gap of several years between reassessment of any given species or ecological community.
The conservation status ranks of some species groups are provided by the national General Status Program.
Access and learn about conservation status ranks
Use BC Species & Ecosystem Explorer to find conservation status ranks of species and ecological communities in B.C. The prefix to the number rank indicates the geographic level at which the rank is applied. Learn what the ranks mean below.
|
Type of Rank |
Definition |
|---|---|
| S | Subnational ranks assigned and maintained by the B.C. Conservation Data Centre |
| N | National ranks assigned by national and international conservation authorities |
| G | Global ranks assigned by national and international conservation authorities |
| View the complete list of NatureServe ranks | |
| Rank | Definition | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| X | Presumed extirpated | ||
| H | Historical (species) / possibly extirpated (ecological communities) | ||
| 1 | Critically imperiled | ||
| 2 | Imperiled | ||
| 3 | Special concern, vulnerable to extirpation or extinction | ||
| 4 | Apparently secure, with some cause for concern | ||
| 5 | Demonstrably widespread, abundant and secure | ||
| NA | Not applicable | ||
| NR | Not yet assessed | ||
| U | Unrankable | ||
| ## | Range Rank—Used to indicate the range of uncertainty about conservation status (e.g. S2S3) | For further information about these uncertainty rank modifiers see explanation below | |
| ? | Inexact or Uncertain—Denotes inexact or uncertain numeric rank | ||
| View the complete list of NatureServe ranks | |||
How is uncertainty expressed in ranks?
What do the ranges and question marks mean? This graphic shows examples of how we arrive at the various conservation status ranks depending on the results obtained when applying the values to each of the factors. Conservation status assessments often include one or more status factors that are assigned a range of values to capture uncertainty, due to information that is not precise enough to allow the selection of a single value. In these cases, the low and high values of the range rating are carried through all steps in the assessment process, resulting in a range in calculated status rank. In these cases, the low and high scores at the ends of the range are evaluated according to the point spread criteria in the first column of the table to determine the final calculated conservation status rank.
Why do conservation status ranks change?
Changes in conservation status rank may reflect real increases or decreases in the risk of extirpation due to factors such as population trends, habitat loss, or recovery efforts. However, a change in conservation status rank doesn’t always mean a species or ecological community is more, or less, at risk of extirpation. Rank shifts can occur for reasons unrelated to the actual condition, including:
Please contact the Conservation Data Centre for more information.