Download as a PDF
Previous PAD Refills newsletters
Conclusion: After excluding a diagnosis of asthma, COPD guidelines recognize potential for ICS deprescribing in some patients who are at low risk for exacerbations or are experiencing ICS-related adverse events. COPD patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥ 0.3 x 109/L are identified as a subgroup at increased risk of exacerbations if ICS therapy is discontinued.
The BC Provincial Academic Detailing (PAD) service’s topic COPD: Triple therapy and device choice looks at the evidence for prescribing and deprescribing decisions for triple therapy (ICS+LAMA+LABA) and compares the features of inhaler device types.1 Visit www.bcpad.ca to book a session with an academic detailing pharmacist in your area.
COPD guidelines define patients as low risk of exacerbations if they have experienced ≤ 1 moderate exacerbation in the past year and high risk if they have experienced ≥ 2 moderate or ≥ 1 severe exacerbation in the past year.2-4 A moderate exacerbation is managed with outpatient antibiotics +/- oral corticosteroid, while a severe exacerbation is one resulting in hospitalization or an emergency room visit.2-4
Evidence that underlies recommendations about ICS discontinuation include: (a) the recognized potential for ICS-related adverse events including pneumonia, (b) ICS deprescribing trials which provide only limited information on patient-important outcomes such as exacerbations, and (c) poorer outcomes in high exacerbation risk patients who had their ICS treatment abruptly discontinued in recent trials.5-12 The table below outlines where three recent guidelines identify a potential role for ICS deprescribing and where they recommend/suggest ICS continuation.2-4
ICS deprescribing versus ICS continuation in people with COPD who are currently receiving an ICS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Clinical scenarios after excluding a diagnosis of asthma |
GOLD 20252 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Report |
CTS 20233 Canadian Thoracic Society Pharmacotherapy Guideline |
ERS 20204 European Respiratory Society Guideline on ICS Withdrawal in COPD |
|
ICS was initiated without a compelling indication | Potential for ICS deprescribing* | Potential for ICS deprescribing* | Potential for ICS deprescribing (weak recommendation) | |
Significant ICS-related adverse events have emerged or COPD symptoms have not improved after adding an ICS | Potential for ICS deprescribing* | Potential for ICS deprescribing* | Factors to consider when reviewing ICS therapy* | |
Higher blood eosinophil counts (e.g., ≥ 0.3 x 109/L) | Exacerbation risk is increased if ICS is discontinued* | Exacerbation risk is increased if ICS is discontinued* | Recommend against ICS deprescribing (strong recommendation) | |
High exacerbation risk or symptom burden/health status impairment remains moderate-high while on ICS+LAMA+LABA | Recommend against ICS deprescribing (weak recommendation) | |||
* Guideline statement or comment without a systematically-developed recommendation. If the recommendation was formally graded (weak/conditional, strong), the strength of recommendation has been included. |
If discontinuing the ICS component from ICS+LABA or ICS+LAMA+LABA combinations, GOLD 2025 and CTS 2023 recommend a switch to LAMA+LABA in most cases.2,3
1BC PAD Service COPD: Triple therapy and device choice; 2GOLD 2025 Report; 3CTS CHEST 2023 (PMID:37690008); 4ERS Eur Resp J 2020 (PMID:32366483); 5COSMIC Thorax 2005 (PMID:15923248); 6INSTEAD Eur Respir J 2014 (PMID:25359348); 7WISDOM N Engl J Med 2014 (PMID:25196117); 8SUNSET Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018 (PMID:29779416); 9IMPACT N Engl J Med 2018 (PMID:29668352); 10ETHOS N Engl J Med 2020 (PMID:32579807); 11US FDA 2020 Trelegy Ellipta Review; 12US FDA 2020 Approval Package Breztri Aerosphere
Enter your email address to subscribe to updates of this page.