Phase 2 Engagement between April and July 2016 was government's second formal engagement initiative to review and solicit feedback on the draft cumulative effects framework policy, draft value assessment procedures, and preliminary assessment results for Aquatic Ecosystems, Grizzly Bear, and Old Growth Forest.
The specific objectives of Phase 2 Engagement were to:
The following documents and resources were posted on the cumulative effects framework website during the engagement period.
Part 1: Draft Policy for Assessing Cumulative Effects (PDF, 0.5 MB)
Part 2: Draft Policy for Cumulative Effects Management (PDF, 0.6 MB)
To support interpretation of these draft policy documents, a draft Grizzly Bear Value Summary (PDF, 1.2 MB) of the draft assessment procedures for grizzly bear, with examples of the interpretation of results, was also posted.
The discussion paper Towards the Development of Cumulative Effects Management Procedures for Cumulative Effect Values (PDF, 1.2 MB) was also provided and outlined a proposed approach for using cumulative effects assessment results to develop cumulative effects management responses.
Phase 2 Engagement initiatives resulted in the gathering of the following generalized feedback messages on the cumulative effects framework policy and overall framework.
See a summary of all comments received from First Nations and external stakeholders and internal stakeholders on draft cumulative effects framework policy and overall framework.
And the following generalized feedback messages on value summaries and protocols.
See a summary of all comments received on value summaries and protocols.
Phase 2 Engagement feedback and comments were gathered and reviewed. Comments identified various opportunities for improving draft cumulative effects framework policies and assessment protocols. Engagement feedback helped to inform, modify and improve the cumulative effects framework and are reflected in the interim policy.
Examples of how engagement feedback changed and affected the interim policy.
What we heard |
Resulting changes to the interim policy |
Ensure assessment results are validated and monitored. |
New policy wording to ensure best information (including available monitoring information) will be used to validate assessment results. |
Improve the management class model to balance the degree of prescriptiveness and avoid unintended outcomes. |
New policy wording changing 'management classes' to 'management review classes' to signal an expectation to review and consider coordinated management responses, instead of automatically triggering a management response. |
Ensure early on engagement and collaboration with First Nations and external stakeholders. |
New policy wording to explore further First Nations and external stakeholder engagement when defining assessment protocols and when initiating and reviewing regional cumulative effects assessment management reports. |
Apply a precautionary principle to the management class model. |
New policy wording indicating management responses may include the intention to proactively manage the value to maintain it in good condition. |
Align policy with Environmental Assessment Office environmental assessment process. |
New policy guidance on how assessments should be considered during the provincial environmental assessment and application process for major projects. |
Ensure the management of cumulative effects for values in the absence of assessments. |
Revised policy wording provides direction on how to identify and manage cumulative effects when there are no assessments for a particular region or value. |
Other general feedback and comments identified both broad and specific suggestions on how to improve the draft policy, protocols and assessments. Many of these will be incorporated into subsequent work plans to investigate how they might be able to be included in future policy and assessment versions.
The adaptive nature of the cumulative effects framework allows for continuous improvement of all cumulative effects framework products over time as we learn more through stakeholder engagement and enhance our knowledge implementing the framework.
Engagement underscores the importance of understanding and incorporating stakeholder ideas and perspectives, while still balancing the diverse interests of British Columbians and the natural resource sector.
Eleven meetings were held with key natural resource sector stakeholders:
Three workshops were held during the engagement period.
Workshop 1 was held on June 16, 2016 in Richmond and was designed to build cumulative effects framework knowledge and solicit policy and protocols feedback from the natural resource sector, including sector stakeholders, land managers, environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs) and professional associations.
Workshop 2 was held on June 17, 2016 in Richmond and was designed to provide cumulative effects framework information and solicit comment on how it relates to conducting environmental impact assessments for environmental assessment practitioners.
Workshop 3 was held on June 27 and 28, 2016 in Vancouver and provided an opportunity for provincial technical and scientific experts from government, industry, ENGOs and academia to peer-review and critique the draft value summaries, protocols, and policy.
Letters of invitation to participate in the development and review of the draft cumulative effects framework policy and protocols were sent to provincial First Nations leadership committees (i.e., Union of BC Indian Chiefs, BC Assembly of First Nations, and First Nations Forestry Council) and email invitations were sent to various First Nations communities.
A Live Meeting was held on June 23, 2016 with NRS internal staff to discuss draft cumulative effects framework policy and assessment protocol changes and provide staff an opportunity to comment and seek more information.
A total of seven Regional Management Team (RMT) and Cumulative Effects Management Committee (CEMC) meetings occurred, including: